I'm thinking the answer is, "No." Right now, DisplayPort 2.0 monitors don't matter. For the use cases you've listed, you're getting nothing but the ability to daisy-chain from one video port-- and ...

At a glance Pros ・Great color performance and accuracy ・Excellent motion clarity and 500Hz refresh rate ・Includes USB-C port ...

VESA, which makes the DisplayPort spec, today announced a certification program aimed at helping consumers understand if a DisplayPort 2.0 cable, monitor, or video source can support the max refresh ...

TL;DR: MSI's upcoming MPG 322URX 4K 240Hz QD-OLED gaming monitor supports DisplayPort 2.1a UHBR20, offering 80Gbps bandwidth. It features higher Power Delivery through USB-C, up to 98W. While not a ...

MSI launches two new MAG gaming monitors in Japan, featuring Rapid IPS panels, 200Hz and 240Hz refresh rates, and competitive ...

For high-performance TVs and monitors, there are two main cable types that you need to know about: HDMI and DisplayPort. (What about USB-C and Thunderbolt cables? They both implement DisplayPort, so ...

DisplayPort 2.1 became a much bigger talking point than expected when AMD revealed its upcoming RX 7900 XTX and RX 7900 XT GPUs. It’s the latest standard from DisplayPort, a revision to the 2.0 spec ...

Monitor makers have been slow to adopt DisplayPort 2.1/2.1a connectivity, which is a bummer if you're in urgent need of a display and want to future-proof your setup (as much as possible, anyway—true ...

VESA's update to DisplayPort 2.1a will allow the use of longer passive cables to connect to monitors, but Mac users won't benefit from the change just yet. The standard, announced by the Video ...

LG is leaning heavily into support for the DisplayPort 2.1 specification on its new UltraGear GX7 (model 27GX790A) gaming monitor with an OLED panel, and for good reason. It's a fast 27-inch monitor ...